Sunday, August 23, 2009

Patriarch Kirill: Courage and faith of the Solovki camp prisoners are benchmarks for today's Russia

21 August 2009, 13:59

Patriarch Kirill: Courage and faith of the Solovki camp prisoners are benchmarks for today's Russia

Arkhangelsk, August 21, Interfax - Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia points out courage and spirit of the Solovki prison camp as an example to contemporaries.

"This is the place where our grandfathers and fathers suffered, but even under mortal danger they abode in Christ, notwithstanding death. There was no other power stronger than the power of their faith and prayers to save the prisoners," Patriarch Kirill said Friday at a sermon at the Cathedral of the Transfiguration of the Savior in the Solovetsky monastery which was turned into the camp prison in 1920s.

Patriarch Kirill remembered that his grandfather Vasily Gundyayev had been among the first prisoners of the Solovetsky prison camp, and when asked about that time, his grandfather "spoke of the most dreadful things very quietly and peacefully," as he would talk about some every day affairs.

Many believers, including the clergy, bishops, and monks became prisoners of the Solovki camp during the Soviet era, but they had set "a great example to unbeliervers and those who really suffered" with their lives, prayers and services conducted in the hardest times, Patriarch said.

Patriarch believes that it is such challenging situation of "spiritual extremism", poverty, starvation and hardships requiring the most courage and strength from the people that allows "them to see God, it is such situation that provides real religious experience and true faith, rather than empty reasoning and deliberation about God."

According to Patriarch, the history of the Soviet period of the Solovetsky Islands and the example of those Orthodox believers who found themselves imprisoned here explicitly define the way that Russia should follow today. "One should be deaf and blind to history lessons" not to be aware of this fact.

Consolidation of Orthodox diasporas can lead to the emergence of new Local Orthodox Churches

07 June 2009, 13:38

Consolidation of Orthodox diasporas can lead to the emergence of new Local Orthodox Churches

Delegations of Local Orthodox Churches has met on Saturday in Chambesy, Switzerland, to discuss problems of the Orthodox diaspora. It's been the fourth Pan-Orthodox Pre-Council Conference, the previous one took place in 1986. Before his departure for Switzerland, Archbishop Hilarion of Volokolamsk explained in an interview to Interfax-Religion the latest position. of the Moscow Patriarchate on inter-Orthodox dialogue.


- The forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Pre-Council Conference in Chambesy will deal with the Orthodox diaspora. What is today’s Orthodox diaspora in your view? Can we speak about even the smallest degree of its integrity or does it represent scattered local communities of the faithful of Local Churches whose ethnic and national ‘dividing walls’ reach as high as heaven?

- The life and order of an Orthodox community that exists outside its Local Orthodox Church is often a direct reflection of the picture of church life as it has developed historically within this particular Church. Along with parishes of various ethnic traditions – Greek, Russian, Romanian, Serbian, etc. – in the diaspora there are also multinational parishes, which seek to meet the needs of their parishioners whom the fate has willed to come under their responsibility. The Orthodox Diaspora therefore has many faces just as the Orthodox world itself is diverse.

But to say that Orthodox communities are utterly split would be to show real ignorance about the very life of the diaspora. It is characteristic of an Orthodox person to seek communication with a like-minded Orthodox person, and people would sometimes overcome great distances, language barriers and other obstacles to meet a particular Orthodox priest or attend a divine service. In this way the gradual consolidation of Orthodox diasporas takes place, which we think can lead in the future to the emergence of new Local Orthodox Churches.

- Will you name please the most obvious ‘painful spots’ of today’s inter-Orthodox dialogue and, of course, possible ways of healing them?

- The way of healing ‘painful spots’ is indicated in the question itself: it is dialogue, common discussion on arising problems, liturgical communion and fellowship in other church activities, introduction to the customs of every national tradition, free exchange of opinions and joint decision-making in the spirit of Christ, the Gospel and the Holy Tradition of the Church.

Today one cannot say that any particular problem presents a serious threat to the unity of Orthodoxy. What is on the agenda is the fostering of unity through common decisions on the dialogue with Catholicism and Protestantism, on developing possible unification in applying sacred canons in the modern world, on the regulation of church life in the Orthodox diaspora, on the understanding of the church institutions of autocephaly and autonomy and so forth.

- What are the specific intra-confessional tasks of inter-Orthodox dialogue, distinct from those of inter-Christian dialogue? How the Orthodox unity is important in itself, outside the fraternal relations with the Catholics, Protestants and other Christians?

- The most important task of pan-Orthodox dialogue has always lied in fostering the unity of the Church with preserving its Holy Tradition. To this end it is necessary to consolidate the theological self-awareness of the Orthodox Church, to exchange experience in catechism and education, to provide pastoral care and to ensure the Church’s participation in social work in today’s situation and many other things. The unity of Orthodoxy is also necessary for elaborating a common response to the challenges presented by the rapidly changing world. Among the forms of real expression of pan-Orthodox cooperation are preparations for the Holy and Great Council of the Eastern Orthodox Church, which is to consider some pressing issues requiring a pan-Orthodox decision. The work of Councils should demonstrate the effectiveness of Orthodox ecclesiological tradition in the modern historical situation.

Friday, August 21, 2009

Life

"Life of the soul is union with God, as life of the body is union with the soul. As the soul was separated from God and died in consequence of the violation of the commandment, so by obedience to the commandment it is again united to God and is quickened. This is why the Lord says in the Gospels, 'The words I speak to you are spirit and life' (Jn. 6:63)."

St. Gregory Palamas

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Fr. Christopher Walusimbi needs assistance - Uganda ROCOR

UKASE
№: 8.04.09

August 19, 2009
The Transfiguration of Our Lord

To all rectors of the Eastern American Diocese


I hereby direct the rectors of the Eastern American Diocese, on the first Sunday following receipt of this directive, to collect
donations on behalf of our brother in Christ, Fr. Christopher Walusimbi, and the struggling ROCOR Mission in Uganda.
Their situation is dire; please see Fr. Christopher’s letter (attached).

All donations should be sent to:

Fund for Assistance/Uganda
c/o Synod of Bishops
75 E. 93 St.
New York, New York 10128

+ HILARION
Metropolitan of Eastern America & New York
First Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia

Archpriest Serge Lukianov
Secretary, Eastern American Diocese

Monday, August 17, 2009

Lives of The Saints

"Saints are people who live on earth by holy, eternal Divine truths. That is why the Lives of the Saints are actually applied dogmatics, for in them all the holy eternal dogmatic truths are experienced in all their life-creating and creative energies. In the Lives of the Saints it is most evidently shown that dogmas are not only ontological truths in themselves and for themselves, but that each one of them is a wellspring of eternal life and a source of holy spirituality."



Fr. Justin Popovich

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Saint Philaretos the Merciful

posted with permission from the author

By Father James Thornton


Beloved Children in Christ,


The formal study of the Holy Church Fathers is referred to by the terms Patrology or Patristics, a terms derived from the Greek “πατέρας” (father). Johannes Quasten, who made Patrology his life’s work, defines this discipline as “the science of the Fathers of the Church,”[1] which definition is precise and wholly adequate.

Yet, Quasten further defines his field of inquiry as the study of “that part of the history of Christian literature which deals with the theological authors of Christian antiquity.”[2] That definition, while adequate from the standpoint of a Western churchman, which Quasten was, is flawed from the standpoint of Eastern Orthodox Christianity, since it restricts the term “Church Father” to antiquity, that is, to the early centuries of the Christian Era. Professor Otto Bardenhewer errs similarly, and for the same reason, in that he avers that the four marks of a Church Father are “orthodoxy of doctrine, holiness of life, ecclesiastical approval, and antiquity.”[3] By way of contrast, Orthodox Christianity holds that Holy Church Fathers are not confined to antiquity but that the Church “has always produced and will always produce, until the end of time, true spiritual Fathers to guide and nourish Christ’s flock. The authentic Patristic witness is not confined, therefore, to this or to that century or era.”[4] Moreover, for the purposes of this series of inquiries, we have somewhat expanded the meaning of the term “Church Father” to include not only men who taught us through their writings, but who witnessed to Christ’s Truth in exemplary fashion by their lives, without having left behind any writings. Such is the case with the man we consider today, Saint Philaretos the Merciful.

Saint Philaretos was born in the eighth century in the town of Amnia in the Province of Paphlagonia, a region in the north of Asia Minor, bordering the Black Sea. He was a man of wealth and high social standing, part of the class known as the gentry, in other words a gentleman of the provincial nobility. His extensive property holdings included vast tracts of land, fine vineyards, and numberless flocks of livestock. To attend to the needs of his estate there was a veritable army of servants and, furthermore, he was blest with a large family. In short, “God had given him goods and riches of all kinds in abundance.”[5] However, unlike most men in similar circumstances, Saint Philaretos’s purpose in life was not the increase of his goods and riches but to live a God-pleasing life, which to him meant to regard himself not as the owner or master of the wealth he controlled but as the custodian or guardian of that wealth, the aim of which was to alleviate the distress of his fellow men. And so it was that whenever a neighbor would express pain over some material loss, or the slightest need for anything, he was there to extinguish the pain and erase the deficiency by giving generously from his own abundance. And for many years God showed his favor by augmenting the Saint’s wealth to the same degree that it was depleted in being distributed to others.

Men and women of this fallen world are not, however, strengthened in their Faith by ongoing placidity and good fortune. Faith is tested in adversity and is strengthened by misfortune. And so God allowed bands of marauding Saracens to attack Paphlagonia and devastate the estate of Saint Philaretos, leaving it a wasteland. The Saint, suddenly reduced to poverty, remained undisturbed, vowing to provide for his family by working the land himself. Despite the abrupt plunge into poverty, the philanthropic propensity did not leave Saint Philaretos. He gave away his last ox to a neighbor whose ox had died. His last horse he gave to man requiring a horse to ride in defense of the homeland in battle. His last cow, and its calf, he gave to a man whose livestock had been stolen. Thus from poverty, the Saint sank into total destitution. His family, hungry and desperate, wailed in fear of the future. Yet, his faith was unshaken. Praying to God, he thought of Christ’s words: “Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment? Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?”[6] Remembering the Savior’s promise, he assured his wife and children that God would not abandon them.

At that very moment, envoys of the Emperor appeared, seeking a pious young maiden of great beauty as a suitable bride for the monarch. By the Grace of God, upon visiting Saint Philaretos and meeting his beautiful granddaughter, Maria, they at once discerned that they had found the proper consort for the Emperor. Indeed, they were correct, since the Emperor was so pleased by the choice that he not only married the girl, but brought Saint Philaretos and his family to the capital, and, since they were to be part of the Imperial family, endowing them with a fine residence and great riches. God provided exactly as the Saint was so sure He would do.

Even in Constantinople, there was no change in the Saint’s charitable activities. As Saint Nicholas of Ohrid and Žiča tells us, he “did not become proud in this change of fortune but, with gratitude to God, performed still greater deeds of charity than before, remaining thus for the rest of his days.”[7] The story is told, for example, that “he ordered his family and servants to prepare the finest of banquets, in as much as he expected the imminent arrival of ‘royal visitors.’ Everyone believed, of course, that the Imperial family was about to arrive. But this was not so. St. Philaretos went to the center of the city and invited hundreds of beggars, cripples, and the poor to dine with him. Each received a lavish meal and, upon departure, a gift of money in the form of ten nomismata. Who was the "royalty" who visited and who dined in the home of St. Philaretos? None other than Jesus Christ, symbolically embodied in the poorest and most wretched of the local citizens.”[8]

Saint Philaretos departed this life in the year 797 and is commemorated December 1st.

It is obvious that from the example of Saint Philaretos the Merciful we learn very nearly all that there is to learn about the virtue of charity or love of neighbor. He was filled to overflowing with this noblest and most Godly of virtues. Nonetheless, of equal magnitude in his life were the virtues of faith and hope. Let us focus on the virtue of faith.

When disaster overwhelmed the tranquility of the life of Saint Philaretos, his faith in God remained unconquerable. He “surrendered his whole being to the mercy of God.”[9] There was not the least concern in his mind that God would fail to provide, not the least temptation to despair, and not the least decrease in his love for God. His faith and forbearance were the same as those of the Holy Prophet Job the Righteous of the Old Testament who, although he also lost everything in a series of catastrophes, still affirmed, “Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.”[10]

Few of us will every rise to the great wealth of Saint Philaretos, and fewer of us still into the depths of his poverty. Our highs and lows will most likely be of a more modest nature. Yet, we shall undoubtedly face some manner of distress and adversity in our lives. When those times come, let us be reminded of the faith of Saint Philaretos the Merciful. Though he lived in the world and was married, with children and grandchildren, his was truly a Life in Christ in the highest degree.

We read that when he was on his deathbed the Saint called together all of his family to instruct them to be generous to the poor and to remain close to the Church, to visit the sick and those in captivity, to love their neighbors and their enemies, and, to quote him directly, to “do as you have seen me do in my life, so that God will keep you under His protection.”[11] Having conveyed his instructions, he began reciting the Lord’s Prayer. He reposed just after reaching the words “Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”

Let us strive to follow his instructions; let us strive to follow his example; and let us strive always to assure that in our lives we do God’s will on earth as it is done in heaven.



[1] Johannes Quasten, Patrology, Vol. I (Westminster, MD: Christian Classics, Inc., 1992), p. 1.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Otto Bardenhewer, Patrology, p. 1.
[4] Father James Thornton, Wealth and Poverty in the Teachings of the Church Fathers (Berkeley, CA: St. John Chrysostom Press, 1993), p. 142.
[5] The Synaxarion, Vol. 2, p. 291.
[6] St. Matthew 6:25-26.
[7] Prologue vol. 4, p. 270
[8] Father James Thornton, Wealth and Poverty. Pp. 134-135.
[9] The Synaxarion, Vol. 2, p. 292.
[10] Job, 1: 21.
[11] The Synaxarion, Vol. 2, p. 294.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Very Rev. Protopresbyter
Father James Thornton, Rector
Holy Trinity Orthodox Church,
Oxnard, California
Orthodox Church of Greece
Synod in Resistance